Recruitment & Employment
Government targets bogus self-employment affecting 900,000
A 12-week consultation examines access to minimum wage and holiday pay, alongside new protections for genuinely self-employed people.
By Rebecca Lowe, Workplace Reporter ·

The UK government has launched a consultation on tackling bogus self-employment, with an estimated 900,000 people potentially missing out on employment rights because businesses wrongly classify them as self-employed. The exercise opened on 14 October and will examine access to protections including the National Minimum Wage and holiday pay.
The proposals, set out by GOV.UK Business, form part of the government’s Plan to Make Work Pay. They also include targeted protections for people who genuinely work for themselves, rather than only addressing those whose employment status is disputed.
What happened
Ministers are seeking views on how to stop businesses using self-employed labels to avoid statutory responsibilities when the working relationship is, in practice, that of a worker. The consultation concerns employment status for employment rights; it contains no proposals to change tax status or tax frameworks.
Parcel couriers, delivery drivers, hairdressers and gig economy workers are among those the government identifies as potentially benefiting. The announcement does not establish that everyone working in those occupations has been misclassified.
For genuinely self-employed people, the consultation proposes a right to a written statement about the individual contracts they enter into. It also proposes extending protections against blacklisting.
These are proposals for consultation, not an announcement that new entitlements have already taken effect. For wrongly classified workers, the stated aim includes making existing rights easier to access.
The background
The estimate of 900,000 people at risk comes from external research cited in the announcement, Low Pay Britain 2025. It describes the potential scale of bogus self-employment, rather than a confirmed count of people who will receive additional protections.
The central distinction is between the description a business gives an arrangement and how that arrangement operates day to day. The government says some people described as self-employed are nevertheless treated as workers, leaving them without access to rights that should already apply.
Employment status is a separate issue from the right-to-work rules extending to subcontractors, another compliance development affecting businesses that use labour outside their direct workforce.
What people are saying
Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds argues that misclassification harms compliant employers as well as the people working under those arrangements. His position is that businesses avoiding employment obligations can undercut competitors that meet them.
Reynolds also says reform should preserve the independence and flexibility of genuine self-employment. The government is therefore seeking to address misuse without treating all self-employed arrangements as a problem.
The focus on flexibility is also relevant to the separate debate over non-compete restrictions and the potential use of garden leave. Those proposals concern restrictions on staff moving jobs, rather than the employment-status questions covered here.
What happens next
The consultation runs for 12 weeks and closes on 8 January. Businesses, workers, trade unions, representative bodies for the self-employed and other interested parties are invited to submit their views through the government’s consultation service.
Ministers specifically want evidence on how to prevent bogus self-employment while protecting and improving rights for the genuinely self-employed. The announcement gives no implementation date for reforms following the consultation.
Why this matters
For businesses using self-employed labour, the consultation puts the practical working relationship at the centre of employment-rights scrutiny. The government’s concern is that misclassification denies workers existing protections and allows some firms to undercut compliant competitors. Directors and founders can submit evidence before 8 January on how clearer rules would affect their arrangements. Genuinely self-employed suppliers could also gain contract information and blacklisting protections, although the announcement sets no implementation date and proposes no tax changes.
Frequently asked questions
- What is bogus self-employment?
- Bogus self-employment occurs when a business labels someone self-employed to avoid statutory obligations, even though the day-to-day working relationship is that of a worker.
- How many people could be affected by bogus self-employment?
- External estimates cited by the government suggest 900,000 people may be at risk. That is not a confirmed count of people who will benefit from the proposed reforms.
- Which workers could benefit from the proposals?
- The government identifies parcel couriers, delivery drivers, hairdressers and gig economy workers as examples. The consultation examines access to rights including the National Minimum Wage and holiday pay.
- What would change for genuinely self-employed people?
- The consultation proposes a right to a written statement about individual contracts and extended protections against blacklisting. These measures are proposals, rather than confirmed new entitlements.
- Will the employment status consultation change tax rules?
- The consultation covers employment status for employment rights. It contains no proposals relating to tax status or tax frameworks.
- When does the bogus self-employment consultation close?
- The consultation opened on 14 October and closes on 8 January after 12 weeks. Businesses, workers, trade unions, self-employed representative bodies and others are invited to respond.
- When will the new self-employment protections take effect?
- The announcement does not give an implementation date. The government is consulting on proposals and seeking views before setting out the next steps.
In this story
Topics: bogus self-employment · employment status consultation · self-employed workers rights · false self-employment UK · National Minimum Wage employment status · self-employed contract protections · All Recruitment & Employment news →
Original reporting: GOV.UK Business. This article is an independent write-up by British Business Echo.
Latest from the newsdesk
- Business Regulation
CMA fines Wayfair, Appliances Direct and gym operator £6m
- Tax Changes
John Healey weighs £1bn marketplace VAT collection plan
- Companies House
Companies House updates suspended and ceased ACSP list
- Tax Changes
John Healey reportedly rejects capital gains tax alignment
- Banking & Lending
Purbeck guarantee insurance applications rise 62%
Related stories

Non-compete curbs could push City firms towards garden leave
City employment lawyers expect firms to use paid notice periods and deferred bonuses to retain protection against staff moving to rivals.

Right to Work rules extend to subcontractors with £60,000 fines
Businesses face wider responsibility for subcontractors and app-sourced workers, with contract safeguards needed and repeat breaches carrying £60,000 fines.